Tajikstan Stadium Structural Strengthening Safety: Why PFM Never Compromises on Critical Materials
- Share
- Issue Time
- Dec 31,2025
Summary
In stadium structural strengthening projects, real safety is determined not by visible workmanship, but by the materials and standards embedded within the structure.
At PFM, what cannot be seen is often what matters most.
At PFM, what cannot be seen is often what matters most.
Stadiums are large-span public buildings with high occupancy and long service life. During structural strengthening works, welding and high-temperature operations are unavoidable. Under such conditions, the thermal stability of reinforcement materials directly affects long-term structural safety. For PFM, safety is not about surface workmanship, but about engineering standards embedded in material selection and execution.
In the Tajikistan National Stadium reinforcement project, PFM strictly followed the design institute's specifications and selected German-imported fischer structural anchoring adhesive. The material delivers stable, long-term bonding between steel reinforcement and concrete, even under high-temperature conditions, meeting the safety standards required for public buildings.
While some domestic adhesives offer lower costs, their performance may degrade after welding-related heat exposure, introducing potential structural risks. For stadiums and other public buildings, such uncertainty is unacceptable.
Despite the cost difference, PFM did not replace or downgrade the specified materials. All materials, construction methods, and execution standards were implemented strictly in accordance with the approved design.
Quality first, credibility first is not a slogan, but a principle reflected in every structural connection.
Quality first, credibility first is not a slogan, but a principle reflected in every structural connection.
A first-class National stadium project is built on consistent commitment to structural safety—this is the standard PFM upholds.